Fairly Unbalanced Coverage (FUC)

News outlets in the US hardly ever report this type of news.   Israeli newspapers however do report on settlers committing crimes against Palestinians, their properties and their religious places, mosques are not exclusive to their hate crimes.   By contrast, a swastika, be it in Europe or the US draws much media and much condemnation.  At the least Mr. Obama should condemn such acts, burning or defacing mosques.  This latest one happened in a Palestinian village ... "This morning another mosque was burned. This time it was located in a Palestinian village inside Israel, a novelty for Jewish extremists who usually target Palestinian villages in the West Bank. The mosque burning is just the last in a chain of “price tag” measures taken by bitter settlers who are angry at their government and of course at the Palestinians who are always the perfect scapegoat for their fury."  MIFTAH.




So, Google "Settlers burn mosque".  No CNN, no FOX, no or hardly any US media..

I decided to post the MIFTAH link on WUSA9 Facebook page and see what happens.

Maybe I'll update this later.


UPDATES..  WUSA9 removed my post.. twice :)
in the meantime they responded to a post about dog cruelty and I reposted the link for the 3rd time.
Fairly Unbalanced Coverage!
Freedom of Un-Speech :p

one more update:
WUSA9 removed my link for the 3rd time
they also removed me
notice the "LIKE" button reappears when you are no longer a fan, and that's because they removed me :)
That's an honor!




in the pic below, my link is removed and the dog cruelty shows.  My link was just above the "sad story out of Md"

Palestine: UN-made by the UN

After World War II the Japanese, Germans and Italians were not forced out of their respective countries to make room for any Ethnic or racial group to replace them. By contrast, the Palestinians were warred against and forced out of their homes and homeland by a Terror State, Israel, and its allies. The UN was nothing but a fake instrument to give Israel the semblance of a legal state. In that context, while real, it is illegal, even some Jews agree.



The United Nations continues to be a forum for the powerful and their veto flexing.

Obama's speech at the UN is the equivalent of 5 kneelings and 100 hail Mary s to AIPAC, the Washington DC based Israeli lobby.



Word/phrase count/mention in Obama's speech to the UN:


2 Palestine
18 Israel    


At 2 to 18 dear Mr. Obama, it is hard to see any "Hope" for "Change" in the US, AIPAC sponsored, Foreign policies towards Palestinians.




1 Israeli and Palestinian (children)
3 Bahrain
3 Egypt/Egyptians
9 Libya/Libyan
9 Syria/Syrian
5 Iraq
2 Iran/Iranian
5 Afghan/Afghanistan
3 Osama Bin Laden
2 Tunisia
0 Saudi
0 Jordan
12 United States 
1 refugees
1 Jerusalem
0 illegal settlements
0 my grandparent's house in Jerusalem
2 Jewish people
1 "exile and persecution" (Jewish)  
0 "exile and persecution" (Palestinian)
1 "six million people were killed simply because of who they are"  
0 six million people were displaced because of where they were
0 refugee camps
1 "America’s commitment to Israel’s security is unshakeable"
0 America's commitment to Palestinian security
18 war/wars
43 peace/peaceful
1 rockets(Palestinian)
1 suicide bombs
0 cluster bombs
0 Lebanon
0 napalm
0 targeted killings
0 Mass murders/Deir Yassin/Sabra-Shatila/Qana

With US presidential elections approaching and AIPAC (Israeli lobby) testicular hold on American politics and politicians, and Average Citizen Joe's indifference, and Arab leaders' preoccupation with their positions of power, it would take divine intervention to change things for the better for the Palestinians.. the sacrificial lamb! Or the Palestinians would have to learn how to scratch their own backs.

Middle East Abnormality

The state of Israel is a Middle East abnormality that the US helped give it a legal status through the UN. What is abnormal about Israel? The abnormal part is when you take a country, Palestine, that is under a mandate of a powerful nation, England, and sanction its ethnic cleansing and get a world body, the UN, to approve it. That is abnormal. If full membership of Palestine at the UN is accepted, then the road to Israel becoming "normal" would be open and yet the Israelis oppose it. Why?
The Palestinian Authority's (PA) upcoming request of the UN for statehood recognition of a Palestinian state based on June 4, 1967 borders would by one account be considered as a recognition by the Palestinian Authority of Israel, at the same said borders.
If recognition is what Israel wants out of the Palestinians, well, here it is and yet Israel and the US government, and some Europeans are fighting it. Apparently the 1967 borders do not serve Israel and the Americans always echo the Israelis.
If the Israelis wanted peace they could have accomplished it with the Palestinians after 1967. But they did not want to give up 1967 territories then and they do not want to give it up now.
UN resolutions for the right of return are in place. This is the core of the issue. If the Palestinians are willing to give up parts of Palestine, it would be for the right of return. It is not the other way around, the land was never Israeli before 1948, so any talk of Israeli concessions on land is just plain nonsense. However, the Israelis would not abide by these resolutions. Negotiations with the Israelis have added to the Palestinian losses. What the Palestinians want to lose are the refugee camps and the refugee status. They simply do not want to be "assimilated" by Arab countries as some Israelis suggest.
The upcoming US elections affects the Palestinian quest for freedom, but how? The situation plays into the hands of AIPAC as they manipulate the house and congress in ways to optimize the benefits in Israel's favor. They are positioning for a presidential candidate who can better serve Israeli interests with the US elections and candidate selection process underway. So with that in mind, decisions made on the UN-Palestine issue are affected by the dynamics of US elections. Again, it plays on appeasing the number one concern of American politicians, and that is Israel and the Jewish vote in the US elections.
For the PA and the Palestinians, going to the UN for recognition as a state might actually be more beneficial to the Israelis than the Palestinians. Again, by their request to be recognized at the 1967 borders the Palestinians recognize Israel and its 1967 borders and in return, as no good deed goes unpunished, get the US veto. But the Israelis seem to be holding out for more lands and settlements, water rights and whatever else they can impose on the Palestinians via so called "negotiations". So, what's a Palestinian to do in a lose-lose situation?
The Palestinians should think like the Israelis and negotiate in kind.  First, forget the UN, nothing good came out of it in favor of the Palestinians' homeland aspirations. No one or nation seems to be inclined to enforce any UN resolution pertaining to the return of Palestinian refugees, and the Israelis are hoping that in time these claims and rights would fizzle out. The only words the Palestinians should remember from the UN are "Partition" and "Refugees". And then for instance, they could declare Palestine, all of it, just saying, and show willingness to negotiate... negotiate how many Europeans, Russians and Americans would be allowed to remain as they are all considered illegal aliens who in most cases entered Palestine illegally, and certainly many of them are terrorists. The Jewish terror that was brought onto Palestinians is well documented, just "Google".
Absurd one might say and I agree...but, well, so was the idea of establishing the state of Israel in Palestine, a country under a British mandate then (1948), a mandate that was sanctioned by none other than the UN itself. And to go to the UN for recognition.. that, is more absurd.

Ignorance or Propaganda?

AIPAC links to JPOST but most commentators make up their own facts and logic, if you want to call it that.   Hardly any objectivity on the part of most.  Some of the commentators ought to visit not Yad Vashem but a living multi generational Palestinian refugee camp, one of Israel's higher accomplishments in ethnic cleansing.  

Some people just don't get it!! 

For some reason the facebook content is not showing entirely, so the following is the content in plain text format.

from Facebook..

[AIPAC – The American Israel Public Affairs Committee


PM: Palestinians doing all they can to avoid peace talks
www.jpost.com
Netanyahu meets with Belgian PM Leterme; says he is willing to go to Ramallah for peace talks; decries Palestinian bid for recognition of state at UN as a plan that will only push back the peace process.
714 · Like ·  · Share · about an hour ago
14 people like this.
Owen Rockett Appeasement doesn't produce peace. Strength is the only legitimate way to peace.
about an hour ago · Like ·  3 people
Jeremy Ryan Well that's probably because the want to "push the Jews into the sea" as they say. Peace hurts their chances for genocide.
about an hour ago · Like ·  1 person
Kolawole Salami Seems sensible as 'peace' talks over the past 30 years have only resulted in wider Jewish settlements
about an hour ago · Like
Ethan Borst honestly, i dont care anymore, im not contributing
about an hour ago · Like
Jeremy Ryan Settlements in places like the "west bank" more accurately referred to by its historically correct name Judea named after the Jews who settled the land before any poser palastinians tried to act like it was their land when actually they are Jordanian Arabs masquerading as a nationality based on the Philistines who don't exist as a nation any longer. The bottom line is the Arabs have the whole middle east and Mecca. Leave the Jews what they earned in the six day war, a war they did not start by the way, and stop trying to claim u only want the land when we all know u want to kill all the Jews. Anyone who thinks this is about settlements or land is missing the point.
50 minutes ago · Like
Robin Nicholls I must have missed something. What changed since PM Netanyahu made his magnificant speech at the US Congress when he stated very clearly o the world you can't make peace with any group that wants your total annhilation (or something to that effect). Israel doesn't have a oeace partner with the PA...G-d help Israel & Bless all its leaders with wisodm & courage.
42 minutes ago · Like
Kolawole Salami ‎@Jeremy Ryan. If living in a place by force and genocidal terror is what appeals to u, u can continue with that delusional line of reasoning. Swapping archaic history for today's reality. The purpose of God for His creatures is for us to live as one in peace, not some people segregating themselves as Jews or Arabs, black or whites.]

AIPAC – The American Israel Public Affairs Committee

PM: Palestinians doing all they can to avoid peace talks

www.jpost.com

Netanyahu meets with Belgian PM Leterme; says he is willing to go to Ramallah for peace talks; decries Palestinian bid for recognition of state at UN as a plan that will only push back the peace process.

714 ·  ·  · Share · about an hour ago

• 
  

  14 people like this.
• • 
    

    Owen Rockett Appeasement doesn't produce peace. Strength is the only legitimate way to peace.
    

    about an hour ago ·  ·  3 people
  • 
    

    Jeremy Ryan Well that's probably because the want to "push the Jews into the sea" as they say. Peace hurts their chances for genocide.
    

    about an hour ago ·  ·  1 person
  • 
    

    Kolawole Salami Seems sensible as 'peace' talks over the past 30 years have only resulted in wider Jewish settlements
    

    about an hour ago · 
  • 
    

    Ethan Borst honestly, i dont care anymore, im not contributing
    

    about an hour ago · 
  • 
    

    Jeremy Ryan Settlements in places like the "west bank" more accurately referred to by its historically correct name Judea named after the Jews who settled the land before any poser palastinians tried to act like it was their land when actually they are Jordanian Arabs masquerading as a nationality based on the Philistines who don't exist as a nation any longer. The bottom line is the Arabs have the whole middle east and Mecca. Leave the Jews what they earned in the six day war, a war they did not start by the way, and stop trying to claim u only want the land when we all know u want to kill all the Jews. Anyone who thinks this is about settlements or land is missing the point.
    

    50 minutes ago · 
  • 
    

    Robin Nicholls I must have missed something. What changed since PM Netanyahu made his magnificant speech at the US Congress when he stated very clearly o the world you can't make peace with any group that wants your total annhilation (or something to that effect). Israel doesn't have a oeace partner with the PA...G-d help Israel & Bless all its leaders with wisodm & courage.
    

    42 minutes ago · 
  • 
    

    Kolawole Salami ‎@Jeremy Ryan. If living in a place by force and genocidal terror is what appeals to u, u can continue with that delusional line of reasoning. Swapping archaic history for today's reality. The purpose of God for His creatures is for us to live as one in peace, not some people segregating themselves as Jews or Arabs, black or whites.

Illusions of Freedom

The US, the great empire.. it is not.  Under stealth occupation and when you see how its elected officials behave politically you would know who they answer to.


The links tell the story:

U.S. House passes resolution threatening to suspend aid to Palestinians

US Congress considers shutting down the UN.

Congress Threatens to Cut P.A. Aid after Unity Deal

Congress considers limiting UN aid if statehood granted

Congress threatens to cut off aid to Palestinians should statehood declaration at UN proceed WASHINGTON — The U.S. Congress has intensified pressure on the Palestinian Authority in an effort to prevent the declaration of a Palestinian state in 2011.

AIPAC.. the brain washing machinery at work 24/7 worldwide

Near East Report.. (associated with AIPAC and part of their brain washing machinery) The article starts like this..	What the article could look like from a different perspective..
Since its formation in the early 1980s as a Shiite terrorist group in Lebanon, Hizballah has posed a threat to international security. The group originally founded by Iran has grown over the years into a powerful global network, supported by a web of charitable organizations and criminal activities. Before the attacks of Sept. 11, Hizballah had killed more Americans than any other terrorist organization in the world. One branch of Hizballah’s international network that is often overlooked is its strong base in Latin America. Given its notorious past and recent expansion, this branch warrants particular scrutiny.	Since its formation in the late 1940s as a racist terrorist occupation in Palestine, the zionist movement has posed a threat to international security. The group originally founded by known and powerful names in International jewery has grown over the years into a powerful global network, supported by western nations and a web of bankers and illegal crimes and activities. Before their onslaught on Palestine, the massacres of peaceful inhabitants and wholesale thievery of Palestine, the zionist had killed in cooperation with the Nazi regime more jews and european christians than any other small influence peddling group in the world. One head of this zionist serpant's international network that is often overlooked is its strong base in North America known as AIPAC. Given its notorious past and recent expansion, this AIPAC warrants particular scrutiny.

[4] Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Palestine? Joel 3:4

The US House of Representatives passed a bill essentially blackmailing the Palestinians.  They do not want the Palestinians to get recognition at the UN in September as the Palestinians plan to put their statehood to a vote then.  Instead they want them to negotiate with the Israelis, on uneven grounds, the same Israelis that derailed negotiations in the first place by a resumption of building ILLEGAL settlements on occupied Palestinian lands.


ONLY 6 SAID NO.
13 SAID PRESENT
AND 5 NO VOTE
 407 VOTED IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THEIR COUNTRY, ISRAEL.
I MEAN THE US... HOW SHAMEFUL!!!
Voting is a privilege in a FREE democratic society.
A tainted vote taints that freedom, that democracy.

This is an example of the power of the Lobby, AIPAC.  US politicians are scared silly to vote what they think is right because the alternative is a slim chance of getting reelected.  Those that disobey the lobby, the lobby puts its heavy machinery against them which manifests itself in the form of financial and political support at the next election, not to mention a possible smear campaign to get rid of those that disobey or even question anything that has to do with Israeli issues.  


Reference Paul Findley. He dared to question. Even questioning is not a good idea. They set an example out of him and he wrote about it. They Dare To Speak Out is the name of his book.


Republicans and Democrats, take a break from fighting like the dickens over American issues, and all of a sudden UNITE to vote unanimously on a bill that favors Israel over the Palestinians and unjustly at that.


Surprised?  Not the least... Take Jim Moran for example.  He currently serves the 8th Congressional district of Virginia.   He is  lucky in the sense that he survived what few might.  HIS VOTE ON THE ABOVE BILL WAS "PRESENT".   Well, Jim Moran and the lobby go way back:

• Lawmaker under fire for saying Jews support Iraq war
• Smearing is a common tactic
• A Direct hit on AIPAC in 2007

Jim Moran is not the only US politician that endures at the hands of AIPAC and their many tentacles.  This 2 minute video sums up much..

The US government's "In God We Trust" is on every penny and the US is a Bible nation and the Bible recognizes Palestine...  "all the coasts of Palestine"  Joel 3:4     but it seems that the US House of Representatives wants the Palestinians to "negotiate" with a higher authority.. Israel !!  for something they stole and are still stealing from them.  Justice in this jungle belongs to the strong and mighty that plan ahead and organize.

Trump and his trumpeters will be trumped.

When a group of people get sick and an investigation reveals that this group of people have one thing in common:  "they all ate the same meal from the same restaurant" then the problem is diagnosed.


This seems to be true for republicans these days because they're all fed the same crap right from their handlers and Fox and they're all getting Trump nausea. 


Donald Trump, despite all his monetary fortunes isn't worth a dime of politics.  But why does it seem that he is gaining favor in the republican ranks and a possible bid for presidential primaries?  Well, if I were a scheming shrewd politician, I would encourage Trump to participate knowing that eventually he won't make the cut as a final candidate for the republican party.  Trump's participation would add fuel to the campaign, not to mention possibly lots of Trump dollars and as they say: "there is no such thing as bad publicity".


Regardless of who gets to be the republican presidential nominee, the votes are already in.  The republicans would vote republican even if their candidate is literally a donkey,  but as long as it's a white donkey... with few exceptions noted.  Yes, sad but factually true most republicans would vote on the race line and not merits.  The democrats would cast their vote to the party nominee and the fight would rest on getting the independents' and the ethnic votes.

The jewish vote seems to be the most important because this is the one presidential (and congressional) candidates would sell their mothers for, not to mention that they would give away the store too to, yes you guessed it, Israel. But why?.


Yes, really, why??  Well, how about pre 1948 elections?    What were presidential elections like before 1948, before the CREATION Israel?  What did candidates use to BRIBE, yes bribe jewish voters with?  or did they? or how about the Irish.. all the potatoes and roast beef for the Irish vote?  or whiskey?   How about the southern vote?  moonshine and fried chicken? (no offense to anyone!)  This might be touching on racial lines, but that's how much of the politics here in the US, admit it or not, go. 


The Jewish vote seems to be the only vote (post 1948) that requires large amounts of US taxpayers' resources be transferred to Israel,  a foreign country.  That is how much influence the Jews, a small minority, have in the US.  Meanwhile Jay Leno would joke about poverty in Kentucky: "got teeth?"


But seriously, how did this loyalty to a foreign newly created entity develop?  Isn't that illegal bordering on treason.  For God's sake we used wheat as a weapon against the USSR partly because we want to be the top dog in the world and yet, when it comes to Israel we kneel down and offer everything.  It's like saying give me your votes and I will serve Israel.  Just a reminder, this is still the US of A and again, before the creation of Israel how were elections run?


When will Americans wake up and smell the stink?


Shouldn't voting be for what is best for the country and not for power feuding parties.   As it stands it's a lose, lose, lose and win situation.  The losers are the american people, the republicans and the democrats.  And regardless of all being losers Israel still comes out to be a winner because republicans and democrats agree on one thing without compromise: support Israel at any, yes ANY, cost to the american public including losing world credibility and the ridiculous and insulting part is that part of the US elections is getting an ethnic vote based on paying off for these votes to a foreign country, because at the end of the day Israel is a foreign country.  Not one other foreign country and ally gets the favoratism that Israel does.  Why?.  And they do it so openely as if it's a normal thing to do.  Let me see the parties, democratic and republican, compete during the presidential campaign as to how much aid and support Mexico or Rowanda would get.   These people have no shame and will do anything to get to power and once there would fight legislation that the other party sponsors just because it comes from the other party.


American presidential elections should be about America, the USA, and Americans  period


And finally, with all his money, Trump won't be able to trump this one.